I feel like the video did teach everything that was required. I think the story could have been a bit more creative but it was still good. I think that all of the Powtoon requirements were met. I would suggest for you to make it not sound as choppy and to not cut off at the end. Also the words could have been aligned with the chat bubbles a bit better, But it was still a good presentation.
Your story was hard to follow, you transitioned way too fast. i could not tell what type of act you were on. You did have all types of crimes in your presentation. If you did this next time review it more or have someone else review it before you finish
The story was creative but I couldn't really hear the information. Your voice was very hard to understand. I also didn't think all of the requirements were met. In the end it cut off and you didn't finish the story.I liked the idea that you were going at but like I said it was hard to understand. I thought you could line your narration up with your images.
I believe the video taught what was required in the rubric, but the animations did not match up with the story you were telling, or they appeared out of place. I think the requirements were met, but it was somewhat hard to understand you and hear some of what you were saying. I suggest you speak more fluently and have your animations sync to what you were saying.
Great Job! I heard all of the information well even though your voice was a little mono-tone. I like how you added text blurbs to important portions of their video. The powtoon ending sounded funny since it suddenly cut off your voice. But in all good job following the rubric.
You did offer most of the information that the rubric requires you to give. You could have made it better by slowing down your talking a bit and lining up your slides better but overall you did a really good job besides that your story line was a bit generic
The video taught what was required in the rubric besides four types of plagiarism, and what a public domain is. The story and or script was understandable and you could follow the topic. The Powtoon requirements were mostly completed besides having transitions. Otherwise characters changed moods, objects came in and out, more then two different font types, and the background wasn't distraction. I would suggest to the creator to try and be more clear on some narration and make sure the images matched what he was saying.
The video followed the requirements of the rubric. It seemed like the powtoon was just cut off at the end and you didn't cover public domain or fair use. I wish you would have used more emotion in your voice and talked slower.
You had the required information needed to get the points and it was very informational. Some things I would change to make better would be to make sure your COPS was good because some things were misspelled. Also the end of the Powtoon was cut off at the end and you didn't finish. Overall it had good information included.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI feel like the video did teach everything that was required. I think the story could have been a bit more creative but it was still good. I think that all of the Powtoon requirements were met. I would suggest for you to make it not sound as choppy and to not cut off at the end. Also the words could have been aligned with the chat bubbles a bit better, But it was still a good presentation.
ReplyDeleteYour story was hard to follow, you transitioned way too fast. i could not tell what type of act you were on. You did have all types of crimes in your presentation. If you did this next time review it more or have someone else review it before you finish
ReplyDeleteThe story was creative but I couldn't really hear the information. Your voice was very hard to understand. I also didn't think all of the requirements were met. In the end it cut off and you didn't finish the story.I liked the idea that you were going at but like I said it was hard to understand. I thought you could line your narration up with your images.
ReplyDeleteI believe the video taught what was required in the rubric, but the animations did not match up with the story you were telling, or they appeared out of place. I think the requirements were met, but it was somewhat hard to understand you and hear some of what you were saying. I suggest you speak more fluently and have your animations sync to what you were saying.
ReplyDeleteGreat Job! I heard all of the information well even though your voice was a little mono-tone. I like how you added text blurbs to important portions of their video. The powtoon ending sounded funny since it suddenly cut off your voice. But in all good job following the rubric.
ReplyDeleteYou did offer most of the information that the rubric requires you to give. You could have made it better by slowing down your talking a bit and lining up your slides better but overall you did a really good job besides that your story line was a bit generic
ReplyDeleteThe video taught what was required in the rubric besides four types of plagiarism, and what a public domain is. The story and or script was understandable and you could follow the topic. The Powtoon requirements were mostly completed besides having transitions. Otherwise characters changed moods, objects came in and out, more then two different font types, and the background wasn't distraction. I would
ReplyDeletesuggest to the creator to try and be more clear on some narration and make sure the images matched what he was saying.
The video followed the requirements of the rubric. It seemed like the powtoon was just cut off at the end and you didn't cover public domain or fair use. I wish you would have used more emotion in your voice and talked slower.
ReplyDeleteYou had the required information needed to get the points and it was very informational. Some things I would change to make better would be to make sure your COPS was good because some things were misspelled. Also the end of the Powtoon was cut off at the end and you didn't finish. Overall it had good information included.
ReplyDelete